According to the United Kingdom’s Higher
Education Statistics Agency (HESA), Nigeria was the third non-European
Union country sending the highest number of students to the UK in recent
times. In 2009/10, it had 16,680 students in UK higher institutions and
in 2010/11, there were 17,585 Nigerian students in those institutions –
ranking only behind India and China.
These figures hold different
significance for Nigeria and the UK as it holds for different
institutions and analysts within Nigeria. For the UK, this year-on-year
growth is evidence that marketing efforts in Nigeria by its schools are
yielding fruits and Nigeria is now one of the major sources of income
for its higher institutions. For the Nigerian government, the UK, in
addition to being a top destination for foreign exchange out of Nigeria,
is also one of the top recipients of its students seeking premium
education outside its shores. Other destinations include the USA,
Canada, Singapore, Malaysia, Hungary and Ghana.
For the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN),
if as expected it monitors these outflows, this must represent a
remarkable movement in the country’s current account and one that will
impact the country’s balance of trade with the UK. Ideally, it should
raise no eyebrows if there are significant inward returns from this
expenditure. The trend, however, does not suggest that Nigeria’s economy
significantly benefits from the resultant output. Some of the eventual
graduates do not make it back to Nigeria and those who make it back have
not been timeously absorbed into the productive sectors of the economy
to justify the huge expenditure.
For the National Universities Commission
(NUC), Nigerian universities and their administrators, it is an
indictment and evidence of the failure to respond in sufficient measure
to the demand for higher education in the country, such that Nigeria is
now a marketing turf for foreign universities, including those from
non-English speaking countries. The pretence and promises of the dons
that run these institutions are now openly vulnerable to truth and
experience – the reality is that “our best brains” can no longer provide
sustainable succession plans in our higher institutions; would-be
successors have increasingly looked beyond our shores without returning.
It is now a cheap exercise to continue blaming governments in Nigeria
for the near collapse of institutions and values. This is not as if any
credible defence can be mustered by the various governments we have been
blest with. Yes, we know we have been misruled, corrupted and abused by
all sorts of pseudo-leaders who have either been unwilling or
unprepared to rule right from independence to date, but what
contributions or research have emanated from our ivory towers to stem
the tide?
With the recent increase in tuition fees
in the UK rising up to £9000 for Home Students per session and more for
foreign students, average annual fees for Nigerian students would be
about £10,000 with additional annual expenses of £2000 for feeding and
accommodation. It then means that in the last two academic sessions,
going by HESA’s figures, Nigeria has paid out at least £411,180,000
(N102,795,000,000 at £250 to the naira) in two years to UK higher
institutions for the education of a tiny percentile of Nigeria’s student
population. This is in addition to what is paid to other countries. I
imagine these movements must be of concern to the irrepressible CBN
governor, notwithstanding the depth or health of the nation’s coffers.
Figures from the Budget Office of the
Federation in Nigeria confirms the proposed combined allocations in the
2013 budget to the five federal universities in Benin, Ibadan, Lagos,
Nsukka, and Zaria at precisely N64,075,077,698 (£256,300,310). From
figures available from the Universities Matriculation Examination
Brochure 2000-2001, these five universities are about the largest in the
country with a combined enrolment in excess of 116,000 as at 12 years
ago. Current enrolment in these universities would have risen above
130,000.
The annual spend of N3,000,000 (£12,000)
by each Nigerian student in the UK and the proposed allocation of about
N500,000 (£2000) per head in the 2013 budget on each of the students
from our five elite universities, going by the assumed enrolment figure
above, will only best describe us as connoisseurs of irony – we will
rather hand over more to foreign universities than we are prepared to
cede to our own institutions. The best these universities can churn out
on this budget would be generations of casually informed graduates. It
would be pedantic to delve into the results these disparate figures will
produce or the damage this poses to the future of Nigeria, and the
prospect of employment of the country’s army of youth whose current
unemployment rate is put at over 40 percent. Even if achievable, the
government’s much bandied Vision 2020-20 would be no more than a mirage
or a crinkle of papers in the same manner the year 2000 passed without
the health for all or education for all promised in the decades
preceding that particular year.
It is interesting to note that in the
same 2013 budget proposals, the allocation to the National Assembly is
N150 billion (£600,000,000), about a quarter of The Gambia’s GDP. As if
lawmaking is an end itself and in continuation of the buffet politics
Nigeria has bequeathed on itself, the country will spend that princely
sum on its lawmakers for essentially what is a part-time vocation in
most countries. A figure that dwarfs, by a ratio of 2.34:1, the proposed
spend on the combined students of the five elite universities above.
Lawmaking must be more important than those expected to implement these
laws and build the country’s future.
Whatever laws these lawmakers enact will
have little impact on the future of the country, as the key ingredient
for the future is not being properly developed – the army of youths, the
majority of the country’s demography that are expected to implement,
make sense of or obey these laws will part with these laws like tug and
tow in a marine misadventure. Nigeria’s current population pyramid
indicates that the majority of its population is below the age of 35
years, a relatively young population even if not too far away from the
country’s life expectancy of 52 years. Sadly, this majority is not
likely going to be an efficient one in the future unless the country
prioritises their education urgently. Every country gets what it
rewards; our generous reward of lawmakers, even if good for politics, is
bad for policy. The future belongs to societies with the best
solutions to the challenges of an ever-dynamic world we now live in.
culled from: BusinessDay
No comments:
Post a Comment